<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>Masters-Rudnick &#124; Governance Specialists</title>
	<link>http://mastersrudnick.com</link>
	<description>Corporate Governance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 May 2012 18:35:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.2.1" -->

	<item>
		<title>Ya-hoyvey</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Some thoughts about Yahoo&#8230;  Maybe they should rename the company “Ya-hoyvey.”   After all, not vetting the resumes of CEO candidates – one of the board’s basic and most important functions – suggests a corporate parallel to the Keystone Cops.  It’s&#8230; <a href="http://mastersrudnick.com/ya-hoyvey" class="read_more">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://mastersrudnick.com/ya-hoyvey</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Chesapeake Board &#8211; case study of an ineffectual board</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As corporate governance consultants, providing counsel to boards on how to be more effective, we are fascinated by what is going on at Chesapeake Energy. </p>
<p>The current saga has all the elements that suggest an ineffectual board:</p>
<ul>
<li> Dominant CEO/Chairman</li>
<li>Independence compromised by</li></ul><p>&#8230; <a href="http://mastersrudnick.com/the-chesapeake-board-case-study-of-an-ineffectual-board" class="read_more">Read more</a></p>]]></description>
		<link>http://mastersrudnick.com/the-chesapeake-board-case-study-of-an-ineffectual-board</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Too little too late for the Chesapeake board?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Too little too late for the Chesapeake board? WSJ asks Masters-Rudnick  <a href="http://on.wsj.com/ICSanD">http://on.wsj.com/ICSanD</a></p>
]]></description>
		<link>http://mastersrudnick.com/too-little-too-late-for-the-chesapeake-board</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>

